Evolution of SWMM (Storm Water Management Model) versions, detailing the historical progression, major improvements, technical advancements, and the role of key contributors like Dr. Lewis Rossman. I'll also elaborate on the significance of SWMM5 in the broader context of stormwater modeling, including its impact on hydrologic and hydraulic simulations, regulatory applications, and real-world case studies where it has been used effectively.
Evolution of the Storm Water Management Model (SWMM)
Introduction
The Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) is a prominent computational tool for simulating urban runoff, sewer flows, and water quality. Since its inception in 1971, SWMM has undergone multiple major version upgrades, each expanding its capabilities and improving performance. This report provides a historical overview of SWMM’s evolution from early versions to the modern SWMM5, highlighting key technical advancements, naming conventions of its modules, and major improvements across versions. In particular, SWMM5 is emphasized as a comprehensive, integrated modeling framework that unified previously separate components and introduced significant enhancements in hydrodynamic routing, user interface (UI), low-impact development (LID) modeling, GIS integration, and water quality simulation. The contributions of primary developers – notably Dr. Lewis Lew Rossman – are discussed in shaping SWMM5, along with the model’s impact on stormwater management practice, regulatory compliance, and real-world applications.
Historical Evolution of SWMM Versions
SWMM1 (1971) – First Generation and Modular Architecture
The first version, SWMM1, was developed between 1969 and 1971 through a collaboration of Metcalf & Eddy, Water Resources Engineers, and the University of Florida (Storm Water Management Model). It was coded in FORTRAN and primarily focused on combined sewer overflow (CSO) problems (Storm Water Management Model). SWMM1 introduced a modular structure consisting of four separate programs (or “blocks”): Runoff, Transport, Storage/Treatment, and Receive (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith). Each block had a specialized role and exchanged data via a common format so that the output of one block could feed into another (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith). For example, the Runoff block computed rainfall-runoff from subcatchments, the Transport block routed flows and pollutants through simplified drainage networks, Storage/Treatment handled pollutant removal in storage units or treatment facilities, and the Receive block represented receiving water bodies. The naming conventions of these blocks reflected their functions: Transport for conveyance and pollutant transport, Storage/Treatment for water quality treatment processes, etc. Notably, SWMM1’s Transport module and its counterpart Runoff module formed the core of the original program (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith). This early architecture allowed engineers to perform event-based analysis of urban runoff and CSOs – a groundbreaking capability at the time – although the computational methods were relatively simple by modern standards (Storm Water Management Model) (few of the original numerical methods are still used today (Storm Water Management Model)).
Key Limitations in SWMM1: The Transport block in SWMM1 employed simplified flow routing (a kinematic wave approach) and had limited ability to account for backwater effects or pressurized flow. It provided basic water quality modeling (build-up and wash-off of pollutants from surfaces) but could not fully capture complex hydraulic phenomena in storm sewer networks. These constraints set the stage for subsequent enhancements in later versions.
SWMM2 (1975) – Introduction of EXTRAN and Dynamic Flow Routing
SWMM’s second major release, SWMM2, was completed in 1975 and represented the first widely distributed version of the model (Storm Water Management Model). A major advancement in SWMM2 was the introduction of the EXTRAN module (“Extended Transport”), developed by Dr. Larry Roesner and Dr. John Shubinski (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith). EXTRAN was essentially an extended hydraulic transport block that implemented a full dynamic wave flow routing routine, solving the complete one-dimensional Saint-Venant equations for flow in pipes and channels (SWMM4: Storm Water Management Model Model Facts - SWMM 5 or SWMM or EPASWMM and SWMM5 in ICM_SWMM). This allowed SWMM2 to simulate fully dynamic flow conditions – including backwater effects, surcharging manholes, pressurized flow in storm drains, and flow reversal in loops – which the simpler Transport block could not handle (SWMM4: Storm Water Management Model Model Facts - SWMM 5 or SWMM or EPASWMM and SWMM5 in ICM_SWMM). In practice, EXTRAN enabled modeling of the challenging hydraulics in hilly or surcharged urban sewer systems that earlier methods struggled with (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith) (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith).
With EXTRAN, SWMM2 could, for the first time, rigorously analyze continuity and momentum conservation in complex networks. This was critical for cities like San Francisco, where steep terrain causes rapid, unpredictable flows; the new dynamic wave solver provided much-needed accuracy in such cases (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith). The trade-off was significantly higher computational demand – EXTRAN runs were so intensive that early users sometimes executed them on NASA mainframe computers during off-hours (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith). Along with EXTRAN, SWMM2 improvements included the ability to perform continuous simulations (not just single storms) for hydrology and an early inclusion of snowmelt processes (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith). By the mid-1970s, SWMM had evolved from a CSO planning tool into a more general urban drainage model capable of long-term simulations and dynamic flow analysis, albeit with each major component (Runoff, Transport, EXTRAN, etc.) still operating as separate blocks to be linked by the user.
Version naming note: The EXTRAN module’s name highlights its origin – an extension of the Transport block’s capabilities. Users would run a “Runoff + EXTRAN” pairing to model hydrology and full hydraulic routing, or “Runoff + Transport” for simpler kinematic wave routing. This naming convention persisted through SWMM3 and SWMM4, distinguishing the level of hydraulic analysis: Transport (kinematic wave) vs. EXTRAN (dynamic wave).
SWMM3 (1981) – Hydrologic and Water Quality Enhancements
Released in 1981, SWMM3 expanded the model’s scope and refined its computational engines. This version was spearheaded by the University of Florida and Camp Dresser & McKee (CDM) (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith). SWMM3 incorporated a full dynamic wave flow routine as a standard part of the package (essentially building on the EXTRAN capabilities from SWMM2) (Storm Water Management Model). In addition, major hydrologic improvements were made: Green-Ampt infiltration was introduced for more physically based infiltration modeling, snow melt modeling was added, and continuous simulation (e.g., long-term rainfall records) was fully supported (Storm Water Management Model). This greatly improved the representation of soil and ground processes compared to earlier versions that had simpler abstraction methods.
SWMM3 also made significant strides in water quality modeling. It was the first version to comprehensively simulate nonpoint source pollutant buildup and washoff from urban surfaces and transport of those pollutants through the drainage network (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith). Users could specify pollutant buildup rates on land (e.g., accumulation of nutrients, metals, sediment) and washoff during storms, which the model would route through the system. These additions enabled analyzing urban runoff quality and evaluating pollution control measures. In the hydraulics realm, EXTRAN was updated in 1981 by Shubinski, John Aldrich, and Roesner to handle a wider range of conduit shapes (open channels and closed conduits) (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith). The model’s spatial range expanded to include natural channels (streams, rivers) and surface storage like lakes or detention basins (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith), meaning SWMM3 could model both urban pipe networks and more natural water systems in a catchment. This represented a shift from strictly urban/CSO applications to more general watershed modeling.
In summary, SWMM3 provided a more holistic watershed simulation, combining urban hydrology, continuous rainfall analysis, and water quality in one framework. It retained the modular block structure (Runoff, Transport, EXTRAN, etc.), but all modules were improved. The naming convention now clearly distinguished the blocks by function: e.g., users might use the Runoff block for hydrology, the Transport block for simpler quality routing, or pair Runoff with EXTRAN for dynamic hydraulic routing with quality. SWMM3 became a robust tool for both point-source pollution (e.g., CSOs) and nonpoint-source runoff issues in urban planning (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith).
SWMM3.3 (1983) – Transition to Personal Computers
By 1983, computing technology had advanced to allow complex models to run on personal computers (PCs). SWMM3.3 (an EPA update to SWMM3) was notable as the first PC-compatible version of SWMM (Storm Water Management Model). Prior to this, SWMM was typically run on mainframes or mini-computers requiring fixed-format input (punch cards or strict column-based text files). SWMM3.3 and subsequent minor releases introduced a free-format input style, meaning users could enter data in a more flexible text format with comments, rather than rigid punch card formats (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith). This greatly improved usability and reduced input errors. The ability to use PCs also expanded SWMM’s user base, as more consultants and municipalities could run models without specialized hardware. While SWMM3.3 did not drastically change the simulation engines, it set the stage for wider adoption and iterative enhancements through the late 1980s.
SWMM4 (1988) – Expanded Capabilities and Usability
Released in 1988, SWMM4 was a significant upgrade that accumulated numerous improvements developed through the 1980s. Led by Oregon State University (under Prof. Wayne Huber) and CDM, SWMM4 added new process modules and capabilities (Storm Water Management Model). Key advancements in SWMM4 included:
-
Groundwater Interaction: SWMM4 introduced the ability to simulate groundwater tables and their interaction with the drainage system (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith). This allowed modeling of infiltration from saturated soils into sewers and exfiltration from leaky pipes into surrounding soil, providing a way to account for rainfall-derived infiltration/inflow (RDII) into sanitary systems (Storm Water Management Model). The inclusion of groundwater modules meant surface runoff, subsurface flow, and pipe flow could all be represented in one modeling framework (still as coupled blocks).
-
RDII and Unit Hydrographs: A sophisticated RDII modeling capability was added (e.g., via RTK unit hydrographs) to better predict how rainfall produces delayed inflows to sanitary sewers (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith). This was crucial for separate sanitary sewer studies and remains widely used for estimating wet-weather infiltration.
-
Irregular Channels and Cross-Sections: The EXTRAN block in SWMM4 was enhanced to handle irregular channel cross-sections (beyond standard shapes) (Storm Water Management Model). This improved the model’s fidelity in representing natural streams or custom-shaped culverts and channels within the hydraulic network.
-
Real-Time Control (RTC): Functionality for simulating real-time control of hydraulic devices (e.g., automated gates, weirs, pumps with control rules) was incorporated during the SWMM4 era (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith). This allowed modelers to represent operational strategies like dynamic weir adjustments or pumping based on water levels, which became important for CSO control systems.
-
User Experience Improvements: Unlike earlier versions that required fixed-column text input, SWMM4 fully adopted free-form input files with comments for easier data entry (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith). It was designed to run on the MS-DOS operating system, reflecting the personal computer revolution. In the 1990s, third-party interfaces began to appear – for example, a collaboration with the Danish Hydraulic Institute led to a Windows-based GUI called “MIKE SWMM” which provided the first graphical interface for SWMM4 models (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith). These developments greatly enhanced accessibility for practitioners.
Throughout the 1990s, SWMM4 underwent a series of interim releases (4.1, 4.2, up to 4.4) led by Dr. Huber and others, which included numerous refinements and bug fixes. By the end of the SWMM4 era, the model had grown into a comprehensive (if sometimes unwieldy) collection of modules capable of simulating hydrology, hydraulics (both kinematic and dynamic), water quality, and groundwater – but it still required coordinating separate block programs and lacked a unified graphical interface. This set the stage for the next major re-invention of SWMM in the 2000s.
SWMM5 (2005) – Comprehensive Integrated Modeling Framework
SWMM5 represents the most significant overhaul in the model’s history, resulting in a modern, integrated simulation environment. Development of SWMM5 was a joint effort by the U.S. EPA and CDM Smith Inc. in the early 2000s (Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) | US EPA), led by Dr. Lewis A. Rossman at EPA. Released officially in 2004 (with EPA SWMM 5.0), this version was a complete re-write of the SWMM codebase into the C programming language (Storm Water Management Model), replacing the legacy FORTRAN code. SWMM5 merged all major modeling components (Runoff, Transport, EXTRAN, Storage/Treatment) into a single application, eliminating the need for external linkage of separate block programs (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith). This unification made the model easier to set up and run, reducing user error and streamlining workflows. SWMM5 also introduced a host of technical improvements and new features, establishing it as a comprehensive one-stop tool for urban drainage modeling. Below we highlight the major advancements and capabilities of SWMM5:
-
Unified Module Architecture: Instead of running separate executables for runoff, hydraulics, and treatment, SWMM5 uses one integrated engine that handles rainfall-runoff, flow routing, and water quality together in one simulation (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith). All former block functionalities are accessible within one .inp project file, and the model internally manages the routing of flows and pollutants between subcatchments, nodes, and links. This integration resolved many compatibility issues of past versions and allowed more seamless simulations (e.g. no more manual transfer of output files between blocks). The internal object model of SWMM5 treats the system as a network of subcatchment objects generating runoff, node objects (junctions, storages), and link objects (pipes, channels, weirs, pumps) – a unification of what were distinct “Runoff/Transport/EXTRAN” data groups in SWMM4 (Storm Water Management Model - Wikipedia). As a result, a SWMM5 user can model the entire hydrologic and hydraulic cycle from rainfall to outfall in one continuous computation. This integrated design also made it easier to extend new features across the whole model.
-
Enhanced Dynamic Wave Routing: SWMM5 carries forward the ability to do dynamic wave routing (full St. Venant equations) and improves upon it with more robust numerical algorithms. The dynamic solver in SWMM5 handles backwater, surcharging, pressurized flow, and looped networks with greater stability and efficiency (Storm Water Management Model). Under the hood, Rossman implemented improved solution schemes for the non-linear flow equations, addressing some of the stability issues that occasionally plagued the old EXTRAN block. For example, SWMM5 introduced options for adjustable time steps, improved inertial term handling, and better controls for surcharge iterations, reducing the chance of model instability. In effect, SWMM5’s hydraulics can simulate complex surcharging networks (common in combined sewer systems) with higher confidence. It also expanded support for diverse hydraulic elements (e.g., pumps, orifices, weirs with complex controls) and allows users to define real-time control rules more easily for dynamic operation of gates and pumps (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith). The result is a more powerful hydraulic engine that covers everything from small storm drains to large open channels in one model.
-
Graphical User Interface (GUI) and GIS Integration: One of the most visible changes in SWMM5 was the inclusion of a free, built-in graphical user interface (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith). The SWMM5 GUI provides an integrated graphical environment to build and edit the model schematically, eliminating the need to manually code input files in a text editor (SWMM5, XPSWMM, InfoSWMM, InfoSewer, ICM InfoWorks, ICM SWMM, InfoDrainage: SWMM5 or the Storm Water Management Model from Wikipedia - for Translation Purposes). Users can lay out the drainage network on a map, draw subcatchment polygons, and link elements visually. The interface supports background layers (like CAD drawings or images) to trace the network, and it displays results graphically with color-coded flood maps, profile plots, and time series graphs (SWMM5, XPSWMM, InfoSWMM, InfoSewer, ICM InfoWorks, ICM SWMM, InfoDrainage: SWMM5 or the Storm Water Management Model from Wikipedia - for Translation Purposes). This was a major leap in usability and effectively brought SWMM on par with commercial modeling tools.
Although the native SWMM5 GUI is not a full GIS, it facilitates GIS integration by allowing import/export of data and through “software hooks” for external interfaces (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith). The EPA team built in hooks (APIs and input/output formats) so that third-party software could interface with the SWMM5 engine (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith). This led to integration with GIS-based platforms; for instance, commercial packages like Innovyze’s InfoSWMM and Autodesk’s InfoDrainage embed SWMM5 within ArcGIS, and tools exist to import GIS shapefiles of sewer networks directly into SWMM5 input format. Compared to SWMM4, which had no native GUI or mapping, SWMM5’s UI dramatically improves the model development workflow and opens the door for coupling with GIS datasets (e.g., land use data, DEMs for delineation) to streamline model setup.
-
Low Impact Development (LID) and Green Infrastructure Modeling: Recognizing emerging stormwater practices, SWMM5 added explicit capabilities to model low impact development controls. In 2010, EPA released an update to SWMM5 (v5.0.018) that incorporated LID modeling features (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith) (
Storm Water Management Model: Performance Review and Gap Analysis - PMC
). These allow simulation of green infrastructure practices such as green roofs, bioretention cells, permeable pavements, rain gardens, infiltration trenches, and vegetative swales. In SWMM5, an LID control is represented by layered components (surface storage, soil media, storage reservoir, underdrain, etc.), each with specified properties (
Storm Water Management Model: Performance Review and Gap Analysis - PMC
). The model computes how runoff is captured, infiltrated, or evapotranspired through these layers, and any overflow is returned to the drainage system. The ability to include distributed LID features in subcatchments enables analysis of how “green” infrastructure mitigates runoff peaks and pollutant washoff. This was a significant enhancement, aligning SWMM with modern stormwater management approaches focused on infiltration and on-site retention (as opposed to only “gray” infrastructure conveyance). For example, SWMM5 can now simulate the aggregate effect of many rain gardens or permeable pavement installations on an urban watershed’s runoff response, supporting city-wide green infrastructure planning. These LID features complemented prior water quality functions by allowing treatment and volume reduction at the source. EPA continued to improve the LID module in subsequent updates (e.g., adding more detailed soil layers and underdrain options). By integrating LIDs, SWMM5 became one of the first major public-domain models to support green infrastructure simulation – a feature that has been widely utilized in the 2010s as cities adopted green stormwater programs.
-
Integrated Water Quality and Treatment Simulation: SWMM5 retained and enhanced the water quality modeling capabilities of its predecessors, bringing them into the unified framework. Users can define any number of water quality constituents (e.g., TSS, nitrogen, phosphorus, heavy metals) and model processes such as dry-weather buildup on surfaces, washoff during storms, and the routing and decay or treatment of pollutants through the pipe network (SWMM4: Storm Water Management Model Model Facts - SWMM 5 or SWMM or EPASWMM and SWMM5 in ICM_SWMM). Pollutant routing is handled concurrently with flow routing, so quality analyses no longer require running separate Transport block models. SWMM5 also allows simulation of first-order decay of pollutants, sediment settling in quiescent storage units, and simple scour and deposition in conduits (SWMM4: Storm Water Management Model Model Facts - SWMM 5 or SWMM or EPASWMM and SWMM5 in ICM_SWMM) (SWMM4: Storm Water Management Model Model Facts - SWMM 5 or SWMM or EPASWMM and SWMM5 in ICM_SWMM). The former Storage/Treatment block functionality is integrated as generic storage units where the user can specify removal rates or treatment efficiencies. Additionally, SWMM5’s support for LID means the model can account for pollutant reduction in LID practices (e.g., filtering of sediments in bioretention soil, nutrient uptake by vegetation) (
Storm Water Management Model: Performance Review and Gap Analysis - PMC
) (
Storm Water Management Model: Performance Review and Gap Analysis - PMC
). Overall, SWMM5 provides a one-stop simulation of both hydrology/hydraulics and water quality, which is essential for comprehensive stormwater management studies and Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) compliance analyses.
-
User Interface and Reporting: The SWMM5 GUI improved not just model setup but also results interpretation. Users can view simulation outputs as time series plots, tabular reports, profile animations, and thematic maps of the study area (SWMM5, XPSWMM, InfoSWMM, InfoSewer, ICM InfoWorks, ICM SWMM, InfoDrainage: SWMM5 or the Storm Water Management Model from Wikipedia - for Translation Purposes). For example, one can produce a color-coded map of peak flood depths or animations of how runoff accumulates and flows through the network during a storm. These visualization tools make it easier to understand system behavior and identify problem areas (like surcharged manholes or overloaded ponds). This was a notable step up from SWMM4, which required external plotting tools or parsing text outputs. Moreover, SWMM5 introduced a calibration aid in the form of statistical reports and summary results that help users assess model performance. It also added features like context-sensitive help and a detailed user manual (authored by Dr. Rossman) to guide practitioners. Collectively, these design features lowered the learning curve and increased adoption of SWMM5 across a broader range of users.
In essence, SWMM5 transformed SWMM from a set of separate, command-line engineering tools into a single integrated modeling framework with a modern interface. The naming convention shifted away from the old block names – everything is simply part of “SWMM5” and handled in one environment. However, conceptually one can still recognize the legacy: e.g., SWMM5’s dynamic wave flow routing is the descendant of EXTRAN, its water quality engine derives from the Transport/Storage-Treatment blocks, etc., but all are unified under the hood. SWMM5 has continued to be maintained and updated by EPA; minor versions (5.0 through 5.1, and now 5.2) have added further refinements, but the fundamental framework introduced in 2004–2005 remains. The current version (5.2) includes additional enhancements like climate change scenario tools (SWMM-CAT for adjusting rainfall patterns) (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith), better representation of street flow (e.g., gutter flow and inlet capture, reviewed in recent updates) (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith), and ongoing algorithm improvements for higher computational efficiency.
Key Contributors and Development Team of SWMM5
SWMM’s development over five decades has been driven by contributions from numerous engineers, researchers, and organizations. Dr. Lewis A. Rossman is the primary architect of SWMM5. As an EPA environmental engineer, Rossman led the SWMM5 re-write and development in the early 2000s, authoring the engine’s C code and the official user’s manual (Storm Water Management Model). He served as the principal scientist overseeing SWMM5’s maintenance and enhancements during his tenure at EPA (
Storm Water Management Model: Performance Review and Gap Analysis - PMC
). Rossman’s work unified the model structure and introduced the modern GUI, making SWMM5 the powerful tool it is today. In recognition, SWMM5’s widespread use in urban hydrology is often attributed to Rossman’s vision of an open-source, user-friendly modeling platform.
It is important to acknowledge that Rossman built upon a strong foundation laid by earlier SWMM pioneers. Dr. Wayne Huber (University of Florida, later Oregon State University) was one of the original developers of SWMM in 1971 and a key maintainer of versions 2, 3, and 4 (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith) (Storm Water Management Model). Huber co-authored the SWMM4 manual (Huber and Dickinson, 1988) and integrated many hydrologic enhancements into the model over the years. His academic work ensured SWMM’s methods were scientifically sound, and he trained generations of engineers in its use. Dr. Larry Roesner (of CDM and later Colorado State University) was another instrumental figure – he led development of the EXTRAN block in the 1970s (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith), greatly expanding SWMM’s hydraulic capabilities, and continued to contribute improvements (like the continuous simulation STORM module) through the 1980s (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith). Roesner’s role exemplified how consulting firms and academia collaborated on SWMM’s growth.
Other notable contributors include Dr. James Heaney (University of Florida) and John Aldrich (CDM Smith), who helped incorporate nonpoint pollution and natural channel modeling in SWMM3 and SWMM4 (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith) (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith). Chuck Moore (CDM) implemented key features like real-time control and the RTK infiltration method in SWMM4 (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith). Robert Dickinson (CHI/Innovyze) contributed to SWMM4 and later helped disseminate SWMM5 through consulting and training, and continues to support the user community. In the SWMM5 era, Mitch Heineman (CDM Smith) assisted with integrating LID and reviewing new hydrologic functions (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith) (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith), and Thomas (Tom) Nye improved hydrology algorithms for heterogeneous soils in recent updates (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith). EPA engineers like Michelle Simon, Michael Tryby and Caleb Buahin have also been involved in maintaining SWMM5’s code and documentation ().
Development of SWMM5 was truly a collaborative effort between EPA and CDM Smith (Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) | US EPA). The EPA provided oversight, core coding (Rossman), and the mandate for public dissemination, while CDM Smith (a consulting firm that had historically championed SWMM) provided expertise and testing through people like Burgess, Heineman, Aldrich, and others (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith). This partnership ensured that SWMM5 met both high scientific standards and practical needs of engineering users. The result was a robust, public-domain model that is continuously improved by its user community and developers – even today, SWMM’s open-source nature allows academics and practitioners to contribute code enhancements or custom utilities.
In summary, while Dr. Lew Rossman is credited with the creation of SWMM5’s integrated framework, the model’s evolution is the cumulative product of many experts in hydrology/hydraulics and water resources engineering. Their collective contributions over decades have made SWMM a benchmark tool in urban drainage modeling.
Impact of SWMM5 on Stormwater Management and Applications
Since the release of SWMM5, its impact on stormwater management practice and environmental compliance has been profound. SWMM5 is now one of the most widely used urban stormwater models in the world, employed by municipalities, consultants, and researchers in hundreds of cities and watersheds (
Storm Water Management Model: Performance Review and Gap Analysis - PMC
). Its open availability (free and open-source) and comprehensive capabilities have made it a standard platform for a variety of applications:
-
Urban Drainage and Stormwater Planning: Engineers use SWMM5 for planning and designing drainage infrastructure – from sizing storm sewers and detention basins to evaluating the layout of green infrastructure. The model’s ability to handle continuous simulation and water quality makes it ideal for developing master plans for urban watersheds and sizing facilities to meet water quantity and quality objectives. For example, SWMM is commonly applied in master planning of sewer systems and urban runoff control, including evaluation of flood mitigation alternatives and pollution reduction strategies (SWMM5, XPSWMM, InfoSWMM, InfoSewer, ICM InfoWorks, ICM SWMM, InfoDrainage: SWMM5 or the Storm Water Management Model from Wikipedia - for Translation Purposes). The integrated approach of SWMM5 (combining hydrology, hydraulics, and treatment) lets planners test “what-if” scenarios, such as the impact of widespread rain gardens on city runoff, or the effect of upsizing certain pipes on flood risk.
-
Regulatory Compliance (CSO, MS4, and TMDL requirements): SWMM5 has become a go-to tool for demonstrating compliance with water regulations. In the United States, combined sewer overflow (CSO) control programs often rely on SWMM modeling to develop Long Term Control Plans. Because SWMM can track overflow volumes and frequencies under various scenarios, cities use it to evaluate how infrastructure improvements or green interventions will reduce CSOs, as mandated by EPA’s CSO policy. Similarly, Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit requirements and Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) plans for urban runoff frequently call for modeling to ensure that stormwater controls will achieve required pollutant load reductions. SWMM’s water quality component (with processes for pollutant buildup/washoff and BMP treatment) provides a credible basis for these analyses (SWMM5, XPSWMM, InfoSWMM, InfoSewer, ICM InfoWorks, ICM SWMM, InfoDrainage: SWMM5 or the Storm Water Management Model from Wikipedia - for Translation Purposes). Many regulatory modeling guidance documents either recommend SWMM or accept SWMM results for compliance reporting. Moreover, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has officially accepted SWMM5 for floodplain studies in some cases (SWMM5 underwent FEMA review for use in flood insurance studies), further cementing its credibility.
-
Real-World Case Studies: There are numerous examples of SWMM5 being successfully implemented in real projects. One flagship case is Philadelphia’s Green City, Clean Waters program. The Philadelphia Water Department utilized extensive SWMM5 modeling to analyze how green infrastructure could curb CSOs and improve water quality (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith). By iteratively modeling hundreds of LID installations (rain gardens, permeable pavements, etc.) across the city, they demonstrated that green infrastructure could eliminate billions of gallons of runoff from the sewer system. In fact, modeling showed Philadelphia could meet the bulk of its CSO reduction targets through green infrastructure, leading to the implementation of over 800 LID sites covering 1,500 acres (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith). This contributed to an estimated 3-billion-gallon annual reduction in CSO volume, an achievement guided by SWMM simulations (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith). Philadelphia’s use of SWMM in this context is often cited as a pioneering example of large-scale green infrastructure planning.
Another example is Miami, Florida, which has long used SWMM for its stormwater master planning. As early as 1986, Miami’s Storm Drainage Master Plan leveraged SWMM (then SWMM4) to propose a $267 million program of drainage improvements (including infiltration trenches and stormwater treatment) to address chronic flooding and water quality issues (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith). The city’s recent updates to its stormwater plan continue to use SWMM5 to account for sea level rise and more intense rainfall, developing a climate-resilient strategy for the next 50 years (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith). These case studies underscore SWMM’s flexibility – from evaluating green retrofits in northern cities to designing drainage in flat, flood-prone coastal cities.
Many other cities have followed similar paths. New York City uses SWMM-based models to site and size thousands of bioswales and rain gardens as part of its green infrastructure plan. Seattle and Portland have used SWMM to design sustainable stormwater systems in neighborhoods. Internationally, SWMM has been applied in Canada, Europe, and Asia for urban drainage – for instance, China’s “sponge city” initiatives (building cities with more permeable surfaces and storage) often incorporate SWMM simulations to quantify benefits of LID practices (SWMM-Based Assessment of Urban Mountain Stormwater ... - MDPI). Because SWMM5 is free and well-documented, it has lowered the barrier for many jurisdictions to adopt advanced modeling in their stormwater projects, leading to more data-driven and effective designs.
-
Integration into Industry Tools: SWMM5’s impact is also evident in how it has been integrated into various commercial software and analytical platforms. Several widely used urban water modeling products embed the SWMM5 engine. For example, Autodesk InfoWorks ICM, Innovyze (now Autodesk) InfoSWMM, Bentley SewerGEMS/CivilStorm, and CHI’s PCSWMM all either use SWMM5 as their computational kernel or offer full compatibility (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith). These tools provide enhanced user interfaces, 2D overland flow integration, and advanced analytics, but they are fundamentally built on SWMM’s hydrology/hydraulics logic. This has created a rich ecosystem where improvements or analyses done in one tool (e.g., a plugin for optimization) can benefit all users of the SWMM engine. Even research into high-performance computing for urban drainage (such as accelerating SWMM with parallel processing) is ongoing, aiming to further extend SWMM’s capabilities (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith). The broad adoption of SWMM5’s engine in both open-source and commercial realms attests to its reliability and versatility.
-
Education and Community: SWMM5 has also become a staple in water resources education and research. Many university courses on urban hydrology or drainage include SWMM modeling assignments, training the next generation of engineers in its use. Hundreds of peer-reviewed studies have been published using SWMM for investigating urban runoff, climate change impacts, BMP performance, model calibration methods, and more (
Storm Water Management Model: Performance Review and Gap Analysis - PMC
). The large user community has led to active forums (like OpenSWMM) where users share knowledge and troubleshoot models collaboratively. This communal support further amplifies SWMM5’s impact, as users continuously learn from each other and improve modeling practices. The EPA’s decision to keep SWMM in the public domain since 1971 has clearly paid dividends in collective knowledge and innovation.
In terms of environmental impact, widespread use of SWMM5 has improved the scientific basis of stormwater management decisions. Planners can quantitatively compare alternatives (e.g., “grey” infrastructure expansion versus “green” infrastructure solutions) using SWMM, often revealing cost-effective and sustainable strategies. Regulators benefit from more accurate predictions of pollutant load reductions when cities implement stormwater controls, leading to better-informed policy and permit requirements. For example, using SWMM5, a city can demonstrate that installing bioinfiltration in 20% of its area will reduce annual phosphorus loads to a river by X%, supporting compliance with a nutrient TMDL. These kinds of analyses, difficult to do without an integrated model, are now common practice.
Finally, SWMM5 has proven adaptable to emerging challenges. As climate change brings more extreme rainfall and raises sea levels, SWMM is being used with scenario-based inputs (via the SWMM Climate Adjustment Tool and custom climate scenarios) to help cities assess future flood risks and resiliency options (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith). The continued evolution of SWMM5 ensures that it remains relevant – for instance, current development is looking at linking SWMM with real-time monitoring data to create “digital twin” models of sewer systems that run continuously and forecast system performance (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith). This kind of real-time SWMM application is on the cutting edge of smart city infrastructure management. The fact that such innovations trace their lineage to the original SWMM speaks to the enduring legacy of the model.
Conclusion
Over its 50-year history, the Storm Water Management Model has evolved from a set of FORTRAN programs addressing combined sewer overflows into a comprehensive stormwater management framework. Each version – SWMM1, 2, 3, 4, and finally 5 – added important capabilities: from dynamic flow routing (EXTRAN) to continuous simulation, water quality, groundwater interaction, and modern GUI features. The naming conventions of early modules (Runoff, Transport, EXTRAN, etc.) highlight the expanding scope, while SWMM5’s unified structure reflects the culmination of those developments into one integrated tool. SWMM5, in particular, represents a milestone: it unified previously separate hydrology, hydraulics, and quality components; improved the computational engines; and made the model accessible to a broad user base through a friendly interface and open-source distribution.
The contributions of individuals like Dr. Lew Rossman and others have been pivotal in this journey, ensuring SWMM5’s design balances detail with usability (
Storm Water Management Model: Performance Review and Gap Analysis - PMC
). Today, SWMM5’s impact is evident in how cities plan infrastructure, comply with environmental regulations, and implement innovative solutions like green infrastructure. Its success demonstrates the value of sustained public-domain tool development in the water resources field. As urban stormwater challenges continue to grow, SWMM’s evolution is likely to continue, guided by its rich legacy and supported by a global community of users and developers.
In summary, the evolution of SWMM showcases a continuous improvement in modeling technology – from punch-card programs for CSO control to a state-of-the-art, integrated modeling platform that underpins modern stormwater management and helps build more resilient, water-sensitive cities.
Sources: The historical and technical details above are drawn from EPA’s SWMM documentation and scholarly/industry publications on SWMM’s development and use. Key references include the EPA SWMM5 official reference manuals and user guides, as well as retrospective accounts of SWMM’s history by CDM Smith and others (Storm Water Management Model) (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith) (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith) (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith) (
Storm Water Management Model: Performance Review and Gap Analysis - PMC
) (A History of the EPA SWMM Storm Water Management Model - CDM Smith), which document the progression of features and applications across SWMM versions.
Note on the current and future caretaker of SWMM5
Caleb A. Buahin, Ph.D., is a notable current figure at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), actively involved in the ongoing development and advancement of stormwater modeling tools, particularly SWMM5. While Dr. Lewis Rossman led the foundational overhaul and development of SWMM5, Caleb Buahin represents a new generation of EPA researchers who have contributed significantly to SWMM5’s recent advancements, particularly in cutting-edge areas such as high-performance computing, parallelization, and model coupling.
Dr. Buahin's work has focused on modernizing SWMM5 by exploring:
-
Parallel Computing: He has significantly advanced SWMM’s computational efficiency by enabling parallel processing and multi-core computing capabilities, greatly reducing simulation runtimes, especially for large, complex urban drainage networks.
-
Model Coupling and Integration: Dr. Buahin has worked extensively on integrating SWMM5 with other environmental and hydraulic modeling frameworks, notably through tools such as OpenMI (Open Modeling Interface). This allows SWMM5 to dynamically couple with watershed models, groundwater models, and receiving-water quality models, providing an enhanced integrated modeling capability that extends SWMM's traditional scope.
-
High-Performance Computing (HPC): He has been involved in optimizing SWMM5 for high-performance computing environments, making it feasible to perform detailed watershed-scale simulations and long-term continuous modeling that were previously computationally prohibitive.
-
Software Development and Innovation: Buahin has contributed to efforts such as the Open Water Analytics community initiative, supporting open-source software collaboration, transparency, and innovation around SWMM5. His work embodies the EPA's philosophy of promoting accessible, collaborative modeling resources.
Dr. Buahin’s contributions complement and extend the foundational work of Dr. Lewis Rossman. While Rossman laid the groundwork for SWMM5’s unified architecture and usability, Dr. Buahin and other contemporary researchers are pushing the boundaries by leveraging emerging computational technologies, allowing SWMM5 to meet modern-day challenges such as climate change resilience, real-time modeling, and integrated urban water management.
Thus, Caleb Buahin’s role represents a new phase in the continuing evolution of SWMM, bringing state-of-the-art computational and modeling advancements to the already robust framework established by Rossman and his predecessors.
